The case that references the good faith standard in police accountability is:

The case that references the good faith standard in police accountability is:

• A. Graham v Connor
• B. Johnson v Glick
• C. Tennessee v Garner
• D. Armstrong v Pinehurst

Answer: (B)

Good faith as a defense against civil liability is the idea that an officer or jail official acted honestly, within their duties, and without malicious intent. Johnson v. Glick is the case that explicitly ties that good faith notion to police accountability in the context of civil rights claims. The decision helps clarify that when evaluating whether officials violated rights under a §1983 claim, actions taken in good faith and in line with policy or training can shield them from liability, whereas conduct driven by malice or reckless disregard for rights can lead to accountability. The other cases establish different standards or rules—for example, Graham v. Connor focuses on objective reasonableness from the officer’s perspective at the scene, Tennessee v. Garner restricts when deadly force may be used, and Armstrong v. Pinehurst covers a different aspect of accountability.

Good faith as a defense against civil liability is the idea that an officer or jail official acted honestly, within their duties, and without malicious intent. Johnson v. Glick is the case that explicitly ties that good faith notion to police accountability in the context of civil rights claims. The decision helps clarify that when evaluating whether officials violated rights under a §1983 claim, actions taken in good faith and in line with policy or training can shield them from liability, whereas conduct driven by malice or reckless disregard for rights can lead to accountability. The other cases establish different standards or rules—for example, Graham v. Connor focuses on objective reasonableness from the officer’s perspective at the scene, Tennessee v. Garner restricts when deadly force may be used, and Armstrong v. Pinehurst covers a different aspect of accountability.