During a stop for running a red light, you notice a kid in the back seat jumping around. You could write the driver up for:

During a stop for running a red light, you notice a kid in the back seat jumping around. You could write the driver up for:

• A. Disregarding traffic light
• B. Child with no restraints
• C. Moving violation
• D. Reckless driving

Answer: (B)

The key idea is applying a specific child safety restraint rule when you observe a child not properly secured in a vehicle. Even though the driver just ran a red light, you can still issue a separate citation for the child not being restrained. That observed safety violation directly addresses the risk to the child and is a distinct offense from the traffic signal violation. The other options don’t fit as well: the red-light violation is already evidenced and would be charged separately if that were the focus, a broad “moving violation” is too vague, and reckless driving requires a higher level of demonstrated disregard than a child bouncing in the back seat. So, citing the driver for the child with no restraints is the most appropriate action given the observed condition.

The key idea is applying a specific child safety restraint rule when you observe a child not properly secured in a vehicle. Even though the driver just ran a red light, you can still issue a separate citation for the child not being restrained. That observed safety violation directly addresses the risk to the child and is a distinct offense from the traffic signal violation. The other options don’t fit as well: the red-light violation is already evidenced and would be charged separately if that were the focus, a broad “moving violation” is too vague, and reckless driving requires a higher level of demonstrated disregard than a child bouncing in the back seat. So, citing the driver for the child with no restraints is the most appropriate action given the observed condition.